/* /about/: the type scale, rebalanced on Saranda's review of 3 September
   2026 (her point 8): the vision statement (01) read too large against the
   mission's list (02), and the gap in size between a display line and the
   body under it suggested a hierarchy that is not meant. Loaded after the
   page's own stylesheet, so every rule here wins by order, not by weight.
   Sizes and one weight only: the palette, the grounds, the choreography and
   the copy are untouched.

   Measured at 1440px. Before: the statement 48px, the body 17.2px in the
   light cut. After: the statement 37.6px, the body 18.2px in the regular cut.
   The catalogue numbers and names on the left (01 Vision) keep their size:
   they are the page's index, not its voice. */

.statement { font-size: clamp(1.5rem, 1.05rem + 1.55vw, 2.35rem); line-height: 1.3; }
.statement--wide { max-width: 36ch; }

/* the reading weight, so a body line is no longer the lightest cut of the face */
.obj__body, .rail__card { font-weight: 400; font-size: clamp(1.04rem, .98rem + .25vw, 1.14rem); }
.obj__body .small, .rail__card--note p { font-size: .98rem; }
.set b { font-size: 1.5rem; }

/* the four movements: the word a little smaller, the line under it a little larger */
.rail__k { font-size: clamp(1.9rem, 1.4rem + 1.6vw, 2.8rem); }
.figure-n { font-size: clamp(2.4rem, 1.7rem + 2.4vw, 3.8rem); }